Problem, sounds easy… wrong resolution. Just a right click, properties, etc etc etc… Presto.

Surprise! Your monitor prompts you:   “Not optimum mode. Recommended 1440×900 60hz”

Again, sounds easy. Go back to your desktop properties – then select 1440×900 as it is the optimized resolution for your wide 19″ monitor. Lucky you if you have that resolution. Me? I DON’T.

I tried downloading Samsung’s driver. – NO LUCK.
Updated XP Driver. – SAME, NO LUCK.

Lots of lost souls in google. Seems nobody hasnt solve or fixed it yet.

Well, not really. I thought it was suppose to be fixed if you update your display driver.
(Im using HP 520 laptop so mine’s onboard and its intel. T’was discussed here:
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?strState=LIVE&lang=eng&ProductID=2102&DwnldID=15559

It didnt help. you wont get that 1440×900 on the list.

Even if you pick those other updated intel driver.
http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/CS-028366.htm (keep this noted, youll find this useful – later on this post)

More google – and thank you Lord one smart man who encountered this issue way back 2007 FOUND AND FIX THE PROBLEM. Well for most of us though.

Ill quote his solution and mark red and green those key points you need to change. (on most case, you just need to edit 2 lines – might not be the same with others.):

After some research it appeared that the latest driver from Intel was not configured to support the resolution of 1440×900, even though after experimenting with settings within Windows display properties and actually getting it set to 1440×900 on one occasion. A quick Google also revealed the maximum resolution supported was 1680×1050. I was baffled as to why a graphics controller and its driver that allows a resolution as high as 1680×1050 would not allow me to set a resolution at the lower 1440×900.

It turns out that the driver is to blame. It seems Intel do not configure their driver to natively allow a resolution of 1440×900 (as well as other resolutions between 800×600 and the maximum supported resolution of 1680×1050). It seems this has also been a problem with other chipsets that Intel manufactures (from their 915 series upwards).

An inspection of the zip version of the driver (Intel provide 2 drivers, one in the form of a self extracting .exe and the other is a .zip file containing all the driver files) for my graphics controller revealed that a file within the driver- igxp32.inf (a setup information file) would allow me to specify extra resolutions that could be used by the computer after the driver was installed. Opening this file in notepad, one section immediately caught my attention:

[NonEDIDMode_AddSwSettings]

Within this section of igxp32.inf it appeared I could enable up to 5 extra resolutions for use within Windows display properties. The next line of the file has been commented by Intel:

HKR,, TotalDTDCount, %REG_DWORD%, 0 ; This shows number of DTDs to be used. ; 0–>Disable the feature.

Well I wanted to enable all the resolutions I could, so I changed the 0 to a 5 like so:

HKR,, TotalDTDCount, %REG_DWORD%, 5 ; This shows number of DTDs to be used. ; 0–>Disable the feature.

The next 5 lines within the file seemed to be the settings for the extra resolutions that would be added after this driver is installed. The first 4 had been set already to offer 1920×1080@60, 1920×1080@50, 1280×720@60 and 1280×720@50 resolutions. The last, 5th line had no hexadecimal values, and the comment on the end of the setting was blank, so here is where I edited and added the resolution for the screen I was trying to get working. A quick Google of 1440×900@60 revealed the hex values for that resolution to be:

HKR,, DTD_5,%REG_BINARY%, 97,29,A0,D0,51,84,20,30,50,98,13,00,00,00,00,00,00,1C,37,01 ;1440×900@60

So I edited the 5th line to look like that above and saved the file. Upon un-installation of the old driver and installation of the newly modified driver, a quick delve into the settings in display properties revealed all 5 new resolutions selectable. I could now apply the 1440×900 resolution I wanted.

Thanks to him, he saved (me) the world.

His page: http://www.jjclements.co.uk/index.php/2007/07/19/intel-gfx-driver-resolution-fix/

Just in time to burn in our dataline that just got back after almost 4 day of service interruption.

Don’t worry, I will still upload those Pahiyas, Globe Ka-Summer Concert, Nike:Believer and Mag:Net pics and videos just as i promised

Self confessed camwhore. Shot at Krispy Kreme Rosemont, Illinois near Chicago O’ Hare Airport after accompanying LA from a rhinoplasty in Beverly Hills. LOL! You know im just playing around KKD at The Fort, Bonifacio High Street Taguig Metro Manila

Markku, thanks for the late lift last night. Damn, muntik na ko sumakay sa bus papuntang SM Fairview amp.
LordArt, You owe me a spit

And more link love to the following : Banggigay, Juned, Joey, Gail, Marc, Noemi, Lauren

Can’t help but realize what you got till its gone.

“This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by BlahBlahBlah Inc.” Does it look familiar ? Actually it is lol, That’s the message you see on Youtube.com when they remove a copyrighted video from the Youtube website.

Or if the user deleted his/her own video. and if your movie violates Youtube Terms of Use.

Worry no more!

Those folks at http://youtube.infamousx.com/ made it possible to watch deleted videos on Youtube – Just like Google Cache stores a copy of a webpage on Google servers, Youtube maintains a copy of raw video on their servers even when the video has been taken off the main website.

Here’s a video i deleted to try it on :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60XBnbBJYls

all you need is the video id (60XBnbBJYls in this case)

This thing may not work for videos that have been permanently deleted from the Youtube servers.

Watch those video’s back to life

“… The issue was investigated, and it appeared that the 2.1.1 download had been modified from its original code. We took the website down immediately to investigate what happened.

It was determined that a cracker had gained user-level access to one of the servers that powers wordpress.org, and had used that access to modify the download file. We have locked down that server for further forensics, but at this time it appears that the 2.1.1 download was the only thing touched by the attack. They modified two files in WP to include code that would allow for remote PHP execution…”

more at : http://wordpress.org/development/2007/03/upgrade-212/

So if you downloaded WordPress 2.1.1 within the past 4-5 days, your files may include a security exploit that was added by a cracker, and you should upgrade all of your files to 2.1.2 immediately.

i hope my friends, fans, relatives, neighbors, school mates, batchmates and playmates from crimebloc supports me here

Even your 1-word-comment a day would help me here

or its just their way to bid goodbye ?

• Just try downloading FireFox again from its Official Repository and run the install again.